UniQure has been working on a gene therapy for Huntington’s disease for some time, and as the field has suffered through multiple failures, the company’s program has been set back.
The biotech announced Monday morning that back in July, it had observed “suspected, unexpected severe adverse reactions”, or SUSARs, in two patients after they were treated with the “higher dose” of a gene therapy candidate, AMT-130, in a European Phase Ib/II clinical trial. A third patient, who was treated back in March in the US, had their side effect deemed not related to the candidate, but it then was reclassified as a severe adverse reaction after review.
As a result, it’s halted dosing in the high dose cohort. Execs said that the FDA and EMA had been notified, but no specific dialogue has been made with those agencies yet.
Execs added in a conference call Monday morning they decided to pause dosing after consulting with the trial’s independent data safety monitoring board (or DSMB).
“The DSMB does not view these events as a dose-limiting toxicity and thus far in our investigation, we have not yet identified the root cause of these events,” uniQure execs said on the conference call. They added that they have started a safety review that is expected to end in Q4 this year, and are considering potential risk mitigation plans over the next 2-3 months.
Shares for the gene therapy biotech suffered after the announcement, with $QURE down more than 30% so far on the Nasdaq.
The patients were hospitalized, with the US patient suffering severe headache and vomiting. They were admitted seven days after undergoing a procedure for the drug candidate, in which AAV is injected into the striatum, a part of the brain linked to the basal ganglia and Huntington’s disease, via 3 holes over a matter of several hours. The patient’s hospital admission was originally determined to be related to the procedure, not the drug.
After being treated with analgesics and a diagnostic lumbar puncture, the patient was discharged and then returned to the hospital two days later with a recurring headache, attributed to a leak of cerebrospinal fluid after that lumbar puncture. The patient was treated with a blood patch (blood injected into the spinal canal to patch the leak) and then has fully recovered, according to the biotech.
For the patients in Europe, it was a similar story. Both of those patients were admitted to the hospital around 12 days after the procedure, with the first patient experiencing what the biotech described as “motor and other vital symptoms.” That patient is still reported to have small deficits in fluency, memory and attention. The second European patient reported vomiting and raised intracranial pressure, being admitted around 12 days after that patient’s procedure. Following admission, the patient was found to have papilledema, or optic disc swelling, but no edema (aka swelling) in the striatum along the tracks of the holes drilled into the brain. That patient received prophylactic antibiotics and a lumbar puncture to remove 20 cc’s of cerebral spinal fluid — which led to symptoms resolving and the patient was then discharged.
The company is keeping its research at the lower dose of the gene therapy ongoing, as CEO Matt Kapusta and head of R&D Ricardo Dolmetsch tell Endpoints News that no SAEs had been reported at that dose.
“The event really is something that happens acutely, when you infuse somebody with a gene therapy. We think it only happens at our high dose. Because we never saw it at a low dose,” Dolmetsch told Endpoints. The biotech’s R&D chief went on to say that so far, the company thinks that the most likely thing is something unique to the patients, but they don’t know for sure, yet.
Kapusta reiterated to Endpoints that this setback would not impact the company’s planned data disclosures, scheduled for 2023.
So far, the biotech had enrolled 36 patients, 26 dosed with the candidate (low and high dose) and 10 on placebo with up to 1-2 years of follow-up data. All but 5 patients in the high-dose cohort have already been dosed.
The hunt for a working treatment for Huntington’s disease has been a proverbial minefield. The genetic disease where nerve cells begin to break down in people in their 30s and 40s has so far stumped many a biotech and pharma — such as Roche last year, when it stopped dosing of tominersen in its Phase III, Ionis-partnered trial after the high dose made patients’ disease even worse.
Days after that development, Wave Life Sciences also reported the failure of its Huntington’s candidate, sending the company’s share price down 28% in the immediate aftermath of the news.
Pre-pandemic, the life sciences industry had settled into a pattern. The average drug took 12 years and $2.9 billion to bring to market, and it was an acceptable mode of operations, according to Nimita Limaye, Research Vice President for Life Sciences R&D Strategy and Technology at IDC.
COVID-19 changed that, and served as a proof-of-concept for how technology can truly help life sciences companies succeed and grow, Limaye said. She recently spoke about industry trends at Egnyte’s Life Sciences Summit 2022. You should watch the entire session, free and on-demand, but here’s a brief recap of why she’s urging life sciences companies to embrace digital transformation.
James Sabry’s BD team at Roche has a long track record in hunting the globe for new biotech deals. But they’ve never journeyed into China before to ink a worldwide development and commercialization pact with a China-based biotech on an experimental med.
As Max Gelman reported yesterday, Roche fronted a new alliance with China’s Jemincare with $60 million in cash and $590 million in milestones for worldwide commercial rights to an oral androgen receptor degrader. The deal itself is fairly typical of an early-stage alliance around a promising treatment. The Shanghai-based biotech is largely unknown outside China, but this is a classic high-risk, modest upfront pact that Roche routinely inks.
Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.
Martin Landray knows what controversy in clinical drug development feels like, from first-hand experience.
Landray was the chief architect of RECOVERY, a study that pitted a variety of drugs against Covid-19. And he offered some landmark data that would help push dexamethasone out into broader use as a cheap treatment, while helping ice hydroxy’s reputation as a clear misfire.
“Lots of people told us we shouldn’t use it,” Landray says about dexamethasone and Covid-19. “It was dangerous. We shouldn’t even do a trial. They also cared about hydroxychloroquine and lots of people said we shouldn’t do a trial because it must be used. I’ve got the letters from both sets of people.”
Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.
Biopharma companies that win new accelerated approvals typically have no financial incentive to complete their confirmatory trial because the price of the treatment doesn’t change once an accelerated approval converts to a full approval, researchers from Harvard, the University of Pennsylvania and the Brookings Institution wrote in a new Health Affairs study published yesterday.
Even as new cancer drugs approved under the AA pathway are launched at prices in excess of $100,000, companies often gain little from completing a quick confirmatory trial, and at least part of the problem, the researchers say, is that the FDA rarely withdraws a drug from the market because a company has failed to conduct a confirmatory trial or because the confirmatory trial showed no benefit.
Unlock this story instantly and join 148,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.
PI3K is a protein that is part of a pathway that regulates cell growth, survival and metabolism — earning it the inscription of master regulator for cancer. However, while a number of PI3K inhibitor drugs have been approved since 2014, the class as a whole has dwindled, as it has been plagued by toxicity issues in various blood cancers.
For example, the FDA hit Secura Bio’s PI3K inhibitor Copiktra, which earned accelerated approval in 2018, with an increased death warning in June following the results of its confirmatory Phase III trial. That warning came after a number of companies, including Secura, Gilead and Incyte, withdrew their accelerated approvals for their PI3K inhibitors after failing to complete confirmatory trials. The FDA now requires randomized trials to be conducted for PI3K inhibitors in blood cancers.
Roche’s Genentech is going high style next month for New York Fashion Week. The pharma is hosting its first-ever runway fashion show to raise disability visibility, featuring models from the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) community.
“Double Take” will be held Sept. 8, the day before the official New York event begins, with models walking and rolling across the stage wearing stylish and functional adaptive clothing. Eleven people living with SMA and four advocates will show off the custom fashions created by Open Style Lab, a Brooklyn nonprofit and accessible clothing design collaborative.
Unlock this story instantly and join 148,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.
As Congress continues to mull whether and how to reform the FDA’s accelerated approval pathway, new research on the pathway continues to crop up, attempting to guide the way for new reforms.
Earlier this week, several prominent researchers from Harvard, UPenn and the Brookings Institution called for new financial incentives to encourage companies to finish the trials necessary to convert accelerated approvals to full approvals, or at least reform how companies are paid after winning an accelerated approval.
Unlock this story instantly and join 148,500+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.
It’s been just two days since Endo International filed for bankruptcy in an attempt to dig itself out of thousands of opioid lawsuits. Now one of its top sellers is in trouble.
A federal appeals court on Thursday affirmed a Delaware judge’s decision that Eagle Pharmaceuticals’ generic version of Endo’s vasopressin injection Vasostrict does not infringe on the company’s patents. Eagle’s version won approval back in December, and already, the generic and others like it have driven down Vasostrict sales.
Another Covid-19 vaccine will enter the fray as the EMA kicks off its conditional marketing authorization application for SK’s vaccine, dubbed Skycovion.
SK Chemicals GmbH submitted data to the EMA on how well the vaccine triggers the production of antibodies against the original strain of SARS-CoV-2, along with data on the safety and quality of the vaccine.
“The evaluation of Skycovion is one of the ongoing evaluations of data on Covid-19 vaccines. As the pandemic continues to evolve, it is important that the EU has a wide array of vaccines and treatments to enable the Member States to combat the pandemic effectively. EMA and its scientific committees are committed to ensuring a robust review of all data on COVID-19 vaccines and medicines,” the EMA said in a statement.
Bioscience & Technology Business Center The University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas
If you're already an Endpoints subscriber, enter your email below for a magic link that lets you log in quickly without using a password. Please note the magic link is one-time use only and expires after 24 hours.
We'll e-mail you a link to set a new password. Please note this link is one-time use only and is valid for only 24 hours.
ENDPOINTS NEWS Daily at 11:30 AM ET
EARLY EDITION Daily at 7:15 AM ET
ENDPOINTS PHARMA Daily at 2 PM ET
ENDPOINTS MARKETING RX Tue at 2 PM ET
ENDPOINTS FDA+ Wed at 2 PM ET
ENDPOINTS MANUFACTURING Thu at 2 PM ET
ENDPOINTS WEEKLY Sat at 6 AM ET